Looking This Way and That, and Learning to Adapt to the World

Todd Heisler/The New York Times

Miles Byrin Tani, 14 months, is fitted with a camera system in an N.Y.U. lab.

By CHARLES Q. CHOI
Published: August 16, 2010

//

The infants and toddlers resemble cyborgs as they waddle and crawl around the playroom with backpacks carrying wireless transmitters and cameras strapped to their heads. Each has one camera aimed at the right eye and another at the field of view, and both send video to monitors nearby. When the video feeds are combined, the result is a recording in which red cross hairs mark the target of a child’s gaze.

Scientists are using the eye-tracking setup to learn how children look at the world as they figure out how to interact with it. In the lab, children 5 months and older crawl and walk up, down and over an obstacle course of adjustable wooden slopes, cliffs, gaps and steps. And to add to the challenge, the subjects are sometimes outfitted with Teflon-coated shoes or lead-weighted vests.

It may seem like the set for a new reality television show, but there are no prizes, except perhaps for the researchers. They hope to understand what prompts one child to respond to another, how infants coordinate their gaze with their hands and feet to navigate around obstructions or handle objects, and how these very young children adapt to changes, like those brought on by slippery footwear.

The findings provided by these eye-trackers so far (the first light enough for children to wear) suggest that infants may be more capable of understanding and acting on what they see than had been thought. “Quick gazes at obstacles in front of them or at their mothers’ faces may be all they need to get the information they want. They seem to be surprisingly efficient,” said John Franchak, a doctoral candidate in developmental psychology at New York University.

Although vision might largely seem effortless to us, in reality we actively choose what we look at, making about two to four eye movements every second for some 150,000 motions daily, said Karen Adolph, also a developmental psychologist at N.Y.U. “Vision is not passive,” she said. “We actively coordinate our eye movements with the motions of our hands and bodies.”

Eye-tracking studies have existed for more than a century, but the instruments involved were typically desk machines. The wearable eye-trackers that Dr. Adolph, Mr. Franchak and their colleagues use are based on devices developed over the last decade by Positive Science, a New York company, with money from the United States Naval Research Laboratory. They were designed to help scientists discover things like how combatants spot camouflaged targets in the field. Eye-trackers are currently being used in studies to learn the differences in how amateur and professional geologists scan landscapes and how people examine signs when looking for exits during emergencies.

To adapt the eye-trackers for children, whose noses and ears are too small for the eyeglass-mounted versions employed with adults, the founder of Positive Science, Jason Babcock, used padded headbands, spandex caps and Velcro tabs to keep the cameras in place. The headgear weighs just 1.6 ounces, about as much as a pocketful of change. Since infants often fall headfirst, spotters hold straps attached to vests the children wear to prevent them from injuring themselves with the cameras, but the children are otherwise free to move.

The scientists recruit parents and children for their work from maternity wards. Although a few toddlers could not be coaxed into donning the eye-trackers, so far the researchers have tested about 70 children with the devices.

“The beauty of this is how it helps capture what infants are thinking about during natural behavior. Since what they are looking at is related to their ongoing actions, tracking eye movements allows a pretty direct readout of what might be going on in their heads,” said Mary Hayhoe, a perceptual psychologist at the University of Texas at Austin, who did not take part in the research.

In studies of six 14-month-olds allowed to roam a playroom in Dr. Adolph’s lab cluttered with colorful balls, plush dolls and toy cars, the researchers found that in roughly a quarter of all encounters with obstacles, the infants could navigate past without centering their gaze on them. “Adults only fixate on obstacles about a third of the time, and 4- to 8-year-old children fixate on obstacles about 60 percent of the time, but it’s remarkable that infants can even navigate without looking,” Mr. Franchak said.

The researchers also found that during the studies infants looked at their mothers just 16 percent of the time. That is surprisingly low, Dr. Adolph said, given the importance a large body of past research has placed on children watching the faces of adults as they name objects to learn languages.

“These findings suggest children may not have to look very long to get the information they need, either from people or objects,” said Jeffrey Lockman, a developmental psychologist at Tulane University, who did not participate in the studies. “This gives new insights into how much information they need, or how quickly children might process this information.”

These preliminary experiments only scratch the surface of what scientists might find out about children with the eye-trackers. For instance, Dr. Hayhoe said, learning at what age infants start to look at the ground when someone drops a ball could shed light on when children are able to predict the likely consequences of actions, an important step in cognitive development.

Studies on what visual cues draw the attention of children with autism or on how children with motor disabilities interact with the world could be useful in tracking their progress or developing therapeutic interventions, Dr. Lockman said.

“This is a whole new way of asking questions that’s limited only by your imagination,” Dr. Adolph said.

When Doctors Admit Their Mistakes

Walker and Walker/Getty Images

By PAULINE W. CHEN, M.D.
Published: August 19, 2010

//

One afternoon, I overheard a nurse asking another physician how she was feeling. The physician, a young woman known throughout the hospital for her cheery disposition and sunny bedside manner, looked ashen. She smiled weakly in response and insisted that nothing was wrong.

Well

Share your thoughts on this column at the Well blog.

Go to Well »

“She’s lying,” the nurse whispered to me as the doctor walked away. “She’s upset because risk management wouldn’t let her go to that patient’s funeral.”

That the optimistic young physician would grieve following a patient’s death hardly surprised anyone. We had all seen her go through the death of a patient before: she worked in a specialty where such loss was relatively common, yet she fearlessly continued to develop deep relationships with those she cared for. However, as the nurse so perceptively noted that afternoon, what was more difficult for her to bear this time was not the loss but the constraint imposed on the relationship afterward.

Her patient had died in the hospital a week earlier. In conversations in the hallways and clinics, other doctors and nurses combed through the facts of the event hoping to find some detail — a physiological oddity, an honest misunderstanding, even an error — that could help prevent the same thing from happening to our patients in the future.

But then rumors that the family was considering a lawsuit began to make the rounds. Soon afterward, administrators from risk management, the department of the hospital devoted to improving safety, began warning us not to talk about the case — not to one another, not to the news media and, most of all, not to the family. It was not hard to understand why under this new order of silence attending a patient’s funeral might be discouraged.

Several weeks later, I ran into my colleague once more and asked if she had heard anything about the patient’s family. “Yes,” she said lowering her voice. She pulled me over to a quiet end of the hallway and recounted a recent phone conversation with the patient’s mother. Then she took a deep breath and began grinning broadly. “I know the hospital and the lawyers and the other doctors might disagree with what I did, but I had to talk to the family,” she said. “I just couldn’t abandon them.”

Despite the best efforts of health care professionals, bad things can happen in hospitals. Up until more recently, when errors occurred, the scenario that played out was always the same. Clinicians, devastated but fearful of litigation, would shut down. Patients and their families, grieving but desperate to make sense of the event, would find that their doctors and nurses were no longer responsive or available. Eventually, the most important relationship in health care, that between patient and doctor, would cede to the most adversarial one, that between plaintiff and defendant.

In the late 1980s, one hospital system, the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Lexington, Ky., decided to try another approach to medical mistakes. Doctors there eventually published a paper describing their ”humanistic risk management policy.” It included early review of the events that took place, full disclosure to patients of accidents or errors, fair compensation for injuries and ongoing attention to the relationship between clinicians and patients. And it appeared to decrease liability claims and costs.

Encouraged by these early results and by emerging data linking open disclosure with patient satisfaction, quality of care and improved overall safety, a few other intrepid health care systems across the country began to experiment with similar programs.

Few at the time could argue against the benefits to patients of open disclosure. But in the years since, one question has remained: are these policies also beneficial to physicians, many of whom are already struggling just to get their work done?

According to a study released this week in The Annals of Internal Medicine and the experience of one of the early-adopter institutions, the answer appears to be yes.

Since 2001, the University of Michigan Health System has handled patient injuries by initiating discussions with patients and families, conducting internal investigations and offering apologies with offers of compensation should those investigations reveal medical errors. To examine the repercussions of such an open disclosure with compensation policy, researchers analyzed the number of claims and lawsuits filed against the hospital system between 1995 and 2007, comparing data from before and after the policy took effect.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/health/19chen.html?ref=health

Tapping the Wisdom of the Crowd

By LAURA RICH
Published: August 4, 2010

// <![CDATA[//

Kevin Moloney for The New York Times

Seth Haber, the founder of Trek Light Gear, used crowdsourcing to decide how to expand his business.

Quick Tips:

  • Be clear about the precise task.
  • Use Twitter to get feedback on crowdsourcing firms.
  • Stay involved. Give the “crowd” feedback throughout the project.
  • Be sure to understand the expertise of the crowd you’ve chosen.

Resources:

  • The definitive book on crowdsourcing.
  • View crowdsourcing examples and find a partner.
  • A group of 35 companies, including Trada, CrowdSpring and CrowdFlower, is preparing to launch an industry Web site, possibly this month.

FROM all appearances, Trek Light Gear is a substantial operation. The company sells many products, like its signature lightweight hammock, backpacks, tarps and apparel. It operates a flagship store in Boulder, Colo., distributes products online and sells at festivals and events all over the country.

But Trek Light has a full-time staff of one: Seth Haber, the founder. “I’m always trying to seem bigger,” he said.

For example, when it comes to product development, branding and market research, he has felt the pinch of being a small operation. So last year, he turned to crowdsourcing for help.

Through a local company called Napkin Labs, Mr. Haber gained access to a large pool of consumers for feedback on how the company was presenting itself and where it should be going. The process began with a brainstorming session with the principals of Napkin Labs, Riley Gibson and Warren Ng.

They filled a white board with diagrams and notes, clarified Mr. Haber’s goals for his business and identified his crucial branding question: Should he focus his efforts on the company’s hammock or expand into related areas, like products for campers?

To get an answer, a series of exploratory questions was posted to the Napkin Labs crowd members, asking them about their camping experiences and what frustrations they might have endured. Additionally, they were asked for feedback on the brand itself.

After a few weeks, Napkin Labs tallied up the responses and delivered the crowd’s verdict: expand the business. “It really confirmed my decision not to pigeonhole the business around the lightweight hammock,” Mr. Haber said.

Napkin Labs later delivered a more detailed report and is now deploying its crowd to work with Mr. Haber on new product ideas. Although compensation varies by project, the crowd is paid based on a point system that evaluates the frequency of participation, quality of ideas and influence on the outcome. Mr. Haber’s project was treated as a test case, but Napkin Labs typically charges $10,000 and up for a project that involves both crowdsourcing and consulting.

The process of crowdsourcing involves turning to resources outside your company. But instead of outsourcing a specific task or business function to a single company, crowdsourcing — also known as expert-sourcing and open innovation — makes a public, or semipublic, invitation to a community at large to provide input or work.

Thousands of crowdsourcing providers have emerged offering things like product development, logo design, fund-raising and sales-lead generation. What follows are suggestions based on the experiences of other small-business owners.

DEFINE THE JOB For the Rosen Law Firm in Raleigh, N.C., the task was improving the pay-per-click text ads it uses to generate business online. The process of strategically apportioning the monthly $6,000 budget among 80 to 100 keywords seemed an arduous task for his limited staff, said Lee Rosen, president of the firm, which specializes in divorce cases.

The company had been updating keyword campaigns based on how they performed, a time-consuming process with inconsistent results. “We were on overload,” he said, “and the bottom line is we didn’t know how well it was working.”

The firm tried automated keyword buying, but, Mr. Rosen said, found the computers failed to position the business and capture the market it wanted. Selecting keywords, Mr. Rosen concluded, is more art than science: “We needed a human being.” Or, perhaps, many human beings.

Then, Mr. Rosen heard a podcast by Niel Robertson, chief executive of Trada, a crowdsourcing firm based in Boulder that specializes in pay-per-click advertising. Trada’s more than 500 pay-per-click experts compete for their advertising clients’ business and take home the difference between what the advertisers are willing to pay for a click and what the experts actually spend to generate it.

In consultation with Trada executives, Mr. Rosen broke his $6,000 monthly budget into a daily amount and determined a maximum rate he would spend on each click and where he wanted to advertise. Trada then posted the campaign to its crowd of experts, who set about creating ads and a list of keywords. If the campaigns come in under budget, the experts pocket the difference.

Trada, which recently received $5.75 million in an investment round led by Google, now handles the planning and spending for about 5,000 keyword campaigns for the Rosen Law Firm. Mr. Rosen’s budget remains the same as it was before he retained Trada — but his employees have been freed.

Quick Tips:

  • Be clear about the precise task.
  • Use Twitter to get feedback on crowdsourcing firms.
  • Stay involved. Give the “crowd” feedback throughout the project.
  • Be sure to understand the expertise of the crowd you’ve chosen.

Resources:

  • The definitive book on crowdsourcing.
  • View crowdsourcing examples and find a partner.
  • A group of 35 companies, including Trada, CrowdSpring and CrowdFlower, is preparing to launch an industry Web site, possibly this month.

“Really,” he said, “it’s magical.”

FIND A PARTNER IN THE CROWD To find prospective firms, combine a Web search for the task you want completed with the term “crowdsourcing.”

Once you have identified candidates, turn to Twitter. “This is a place where social media can be superhelpful,” Mr. Robertson said. He suggested that business owners solicit feedback on crowdsourcing providers by asking for guidance on Twitter. Be sure to include the tag “#crowdsourcing” in your post.

HONE YOUR GOAL Mr. Gibson, chief executive of Napkin Labs, said that setting clear goals made all the difference. The best queries, he suggested, are exploratory in nature: “What are people’s thoughts on product A? How can we make it better? And what will it look like in five years?” Mr. Robertson, the Trada chief executive, said that businesses needed to explain their project, their customers and their company in detail. “It’s not always easy from looking at a site to discern these subtleties,” he said. “It really helps someone who’s browsing a marketplace to understand who the customers are.”

PAY ATTENTION Mr. Rosen, the divorce lawyer, also turned to crowdsourcing for a company logo. Through 99Designs, which is based in San Francisco and specializes in graphic and Web design, he put out a query that, he said, reached designers around the world. Throughout the process, Mr. Rosen’s firm gave feedback to designers who had questions, explaining where the work was on track and where it was not. The process led to a logo that he thought reflected the company’s mission.

On Trada’s pay-per-click platform, businesses can track the individuals working on their campaigns and how those individuals are performing, offering feedback and suggestions. Engagement is crucial, Mr. Robertson said: “Don’t look at crowdsourcing as set and forget.”

PAY FOR WHAT YOU GET Crowdsourcing can lead to significant savings. Lukas Biewald, chief executive of CrowdFlower, based in San Francisco, likens the crowd to the “cloud” in that you do not have to predict what your scale is going to be — you can scale as you go, and pay as you go.

InnoCentive, a crowdsourcing company based in Waltham, Mass., worked with Precyse Technologies, a wireless technology company based in Atlanta that wanted to conserve its own engineering resources, to develop a product that would activate a device remotely.

InnoCentive helped Precyse draw up a detailed description of its goals, and the project was listed on InnoCentive’s Marketplace. The price tag was listed as $50,000. Problem “solvers,” as InnoCentive calls its work force, selected Precyse’s project from among others in the queue. The result: hundreds of ideas for a technology that could activate a device remotely. “They delivered not just a solution, but also the algorithm and calculations that proved the solution could be done,” said Rom Eizenberg, chief marketing officer at Precyse.

But if a project does not work out, the money you paid often can be refunded. When PocketMac, a software developer in San Diego, hired 99Designs to create a shopping cart icon for its site, it was dissatisfied with the results; 99Designs returned the company’s $200 upfront payment.

Recipe for Longevity: No Smoking, Lots of Friends

A healthy social life may be as good for your long-term health as avoiding cigarettes, according to a massive research review released Tuesday by the journal PLoS Medicine.

Researchers at Brigham Young University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill pooled data from 148 studies on health outcomes and social relationships — every research paper on the topic they could find, involving more than 300,000 men and women across the developed world — and found that those with poor social connections had on average 50% higher odds of death in the study’s follow-up period (an average of 7.5 years) than people with more robust social ties. (See 10 smarter ways to reach your retirement goals.)

That boost in longevity is about as large as the mortality difference observed between smokers and nonsmokers, the study’s authors say. And it’s larger than differences in the risk of death associated with many other well-known lifestyle factors, including lack of exercise and obesity. “This is not just a few studies here and there,” says Julianne Holt-Lunstad, lead author on the review and an associate professor of psychology at Brigham Young University. “I’m hoping there will be recognition from the medical community, the public-health community and even the general public about the importance of this.” (See TIME’s special report on how to live 100 years.)

The friend effect did not appear to vary by sex or by age, with men and women of all ages and health statuses showing roughly equal benefit. Nor were lonely people unusually susceptible to any one disease in particular. (Comment on this story.)

But if it’s true that we get by with a little help from our friends, then how, exactly, do our friends do it? That is, how does “social integration” — measured by surveys and questionnaires about friends, family size, marital status and the number of household residents — influence long life? The short answer is that we don’t really know yet. “The truth of the matter is that the critical evidence on psychosocial processes and health have come about only within the last 10 to 15 years — even though there’s been a lot of theory on it since the 1970s,” says psychology professor Bert Uchino at the University of Utah. (See TIME’s special report on how to not get sick.)

That may help to explain why doctors, for the most part, have yet to embrace social support as a factor in good health, on par with smoking habits, diet or exercise. Without a good sense of the physiological mechanisms that may link feelings of loneliness, for instance, to biological markers like blood pressure and resting heart rate, it has been easy to dismiss the power of social connections as nothing more than an artifact of the data or, worse, as touchy-feely pseudoscience.

To be sure, the direct physical evidence of the health benefits of social support is much more preliminary than the population-level association reported by Holt-Lunstad. But the evidence is mounting, says Uchino, who has written widely on the physiological links between social life and health outcomes. (Uchino did not contribute to the new review in PLoS Medicine, but has collaborated with Holt-Lunstad on other projects and was, once upon a time, also her grad-school adviser.)

We turn to family and friends for obvious tangible support when we’re sick — from help preparing meals to keeping track of pills, appointments and insurance forms. And caring about others may also prompt us to take better care of ourselves. “A really good example, of course, is someone who has a child,” Uchino says. That new bond is often the impetus to quit smoking, to drink less or to curb any number of risky pastimes.

But the influence of social ties may be even more powerful than that. Social relationships, it seems, may also help our bodies help themselves.

Recent lab studies have shown that, in a stressful situation, blood pressure and heart rate will increase less when people are accompanied by a person who is close to them. Brain imaging also shows neurological differences between a person who is alone and a person who has support: in a lab-induced tense situation, brain activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region activated in times of stress, is attenuated when people have a close friend or relative alongside them. And it’s not just adult stress. In an experiment published this spring, children who were allowed to talk to their mothers after a stressful encounter — giving an impromptu speech or doing math problems in public — showed increased levels of oxytocin, a neurotransmitter thought to dampen the hormonal stress response, compared with children who did not have contact with their mothers.

In one of the most famous experiments on health and social life, Sheldon Cohen at Carnegie Mellon University exposed hundreds of healthy volunteers to the common cold virus, then quarantined them for several days. Cohen showed that the study participants with more social connections and with more diverse social networks — that is, with friends from a variety of social contexts, such as work, sports teams and church — were less likely to develop a cold than the more socially isolated study participants.

The immune systems of people with lots of friends simply worked better, fighting off the cold virus often without symptoms. Studies suggest that the immune response may be affected by stress hormones — catecholamines and glucocorticoids — so that a strong social life thus affects immune function by helping people keep physiological stress in check.

But turning such research into full-fledged medical advice isn’t easy. “It’s hard to legislate social relationships,” Holt-Lunstad says. “And we all know that some relationships are better than others, and not all relationships are entirely positive.”

Since Holt-Lunstad’s new study reviewed the statistical association between mortality risk and relationship quantity, rather than perceived quality, she wonders whether we wouldn’t see even stronger benefits if we focused only on the good relationships. Bolstering these connections may ultimately help people stay healthier than trying to build connections between complete strangers, as in, say, a cancer support group. (Studies on the physical health benefits of support groups show mixed results.) “We need to pay better attention to naturally occurring relationships and to fostering those,” Holt-Lunstad says.

Read “Study Says Friends Extend Lives. Do Virtual Ones, Too?”

Facebook faces criticism on privacy change

Facebook privacy page, AP

Critics say people could accidentally share too much information

Digital rights groups and bloggers have heaped criticism on Facebook’s changed privacy policy.

Critics said the changes were unwelcome and “nudged” people towards sharing updates with the wider web and made them findable via search engines.

The changes were introduced on 9 December via a pop-up that asked users to update privacy settings.

Facebook said the changes help members manage updates they wanted to share, not trick them into revealing too much.

“Facebook is nudging the settings toward the ‘disclose everything’ position,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the US Electronic Privacy Information Center (Epic). “That’s not fair from the privacy perspective.”

Epic said it was analysing the changes to see if they amounted to trickery.

Control reduction

In a statement, the Electronic Frontier Foundation said: “These new ‘privacy’ changes are clearly intended to push Facebook users to publicly share even more information than before. “

It added: “Even worse, the changes will actually reduce the amount of control that users have over some of their personal data.”

Facebook began testing the privacy changes during mid-2009 before introducing them site-wide. The changes let people decide who should see updates, whether all 350 million Facebook members should see them, and if they should be viewable across the web.

Barry Schnitt, a Facebook spokesman, said users could avoid revealing some information to non-friends by leaving gender and location fields blank.

He said the changes to privacy made it easier to tune the audience for an update or status change so default settings of openness should have less impact.

dot.life
Users of social networks are now splitting into two camps – what I would call the broadcasters and the whisperers
Rory Cellan-Jones
BBC technology correspondent

“Any suggestion that we’re trying to trick them into something would work against any goal that we have,” said Mr Schnitt.

Facebook would encourage people to be more open with their updates because, he said, that was in line with “the way the world is moving”.

Assessing the changes, privacy campaigners criticised a decision to make Facebook users’ gender and location viewable by everyone.

Jason Kincaid, writing on the Tech Crunch news blog, said some of the changes were made to make Facebook more palatable to search sites such as Bing and Google.

Blogger Marshall Kirkpatrick was worried that the default setting for privacy was to make everything visible to everyone.

“This is not what Facebook users signed up for,” he wrote. “It’s not about privacy at all, it’s about increasing traffic and the visibility of activity on the site.”

He also criticised the fact that the pop-up message that greets members asking them to change their privacy settings was different depending on how engaged that person was with Facebook.

He said Facebook was “maddeningly unclear” about the effect of the changes.

Many users left comments on the official Facebook blog criticising the changes. Some said they had edited their profiles and reduced their use of the social site to hide information they do not want widely spread either by accident or design.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8405334.stm

Trader Joe's owner dies at 88

Image: -

ROLAND SCHEIDEMANN / AFP – Getty Images

The man considered one of the fathers of the discount store strategy — a cofounder of the global Aldi supermarket chain and the developer of Trader Joe’s in the U.S. — has died. He was 88.

Theo Albrecht died Saturday in his home city of Essen, Germany, his company’s Aldi Nord division said in a statement Wednesday. The company did not give a cause of the billionaire’s death.

Albrecht was the driving force behind Aldi’s internationalization, expanding stores to France, Spain, Portugal, Poland and the United States.

Albrecht and his elder brother Karl both served as German soldiers in World War II then returned home to Essen and took over a small grocery store their parents owned. By 1950 they were already running 13 stores and five years later they had expanded throughout Germany’s western industrial Ruhr basin.

The first Aldi stores — an acronym standing for “Albrecht Discount” — opened in the early 1960s under the motto: “concentrating on the basics: a limited selection of goods for daily needs.”

Aldi now has more than 4,000 outlets in Germany alone, where it is known for its no-frills shopping environment, streamlined processes and a limited range of discount products.

The two brothers in the 1960s decided to divide up what was then West Germany, with Theo running stores in the north. However, they used their combined bargaining power to lower purchasing prices, enabling them to garner higher profit margins while keeping prices low.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38448116/ns/business-world_business/

How computers and politics revolutionized the oldest science

By John Timmer | Last updated about 24 hours ago

Galileo’s notebook, superimposed on the object of his observations.
NASA/JPL/SSI

Because of its immense practical value for agricultural societies, many early cultures developed something that resembled a science: the observational study of the motion of bodies around the solar system. Four hundred years ago, planetary science also became the first to have a solid theoretical underpinning, as Kepler produced a model of planetary motion that accounted for observations and was predictive. But, according to a review of planetary science published in Nature, the actual science languished for centuries until work in an unrelated field spawned the electronics revolution.

The review’s author, Joseph Burns of Cornell University, suggests the key contributor to the stagnation was in the limitations of ground-based observatories, which couldn’t resolve detailed features on most of the solar system’s other bodies. Even as telescope technology progressed, the only object we could study in any detail was the Moon, which was cold, dead, and lifeless, with a rugged geology dominated by impacts. Venus’ surface was hidden by clouds, while Mars, at this distance, seemed to many to be a reddish version of the Moon, although others engaged in flights of imagination, seeing the planet as a water-covered Eden.

So for many centuries after the first discoveries of early astronomers, Burns says that telescope technology ruled the day, with better optics (and a bit of orbital mechanics) aiding the identification of Uranus and Neptune, the recognition that comets were orbiting bodies, and the identification of the first asteroids. Although these discoveries helped refine Kepler’s ideas, they shed little light on the nature of the bodies, and the lack of a coherent picture left us without anything resembling a theory of how the whole thing could have originated.

That left us in a rather bewildering place in the middle of the last century, as Burns recounts: “As late as 1966, reputable scientists argued over whether vegetation might cover Mars. Ten years before, scientific opinion was split on whether Venus was covered by a desert, a swamp or an ocean. Lunar craters, the only such structures observed in the Solar System but for a handful of terrestrial examples, were believed to be volcanoes until 1950.”

Oddly, planetary scientists didn’t clear up this mess—in fact, Burns argues that the field didn’t really exist until NASA decided it needed to create the discipline in order to have someone understand the data its spacecraft were producing. Instead, a combination of technology and geopolitics changed our perspective on the solar system.

The Space Race

Geopolitics fostered the Cold War Space Race, which quickly sent US and Russian probes to orbit, the Moon, and the nearby planets. These missions were enabled by technology that came from the electronics and computing revolutions, which enabled unmanned probes to give humanity an indirect presence at many planets. But computing power played another key role: as various probes sent back data from different planets, the burgeoning community of planetary scientists fed it into increasingly sophisticated computer models, which grounded many findings in theory (a great example of this is the formation of the moon). The same computing power has also allowed the construction of massive compound telescopes with adaptive optics, providing a better view of the other planets, even when there is no hardware present in orbit.

In some cases, the first of these probes was a revelation. Mariner 2 flew past Venus in 1962, and provided the first measurements of the planet’s temperature, which ultimately changed our understanding of how atmospheres and geology can interact. For others, knowledge took decades to build, like the realization that Mars was a dynamic planet that had experienced a water-filled past.

Even as the Space Race ended and NASA’s budget became an exercise in political compromise, the agency launched what may be one of its greatest successes ever: the grand tour of the outer planets performed by the Voyager spacecraft. The stunning finds of the Voyagers—volcanoes on Io, possible liquid water on Europa, the dynamic rings and moons of Saturn—both captivated the public and overturned many expectations among the scientific community. The combination was critical for the launching of two follow-up missions, Galileo and Cassini.

Big surprises

Burns includes some of the biggest surprises that came with the new discoveries, and two of these stand out. The first is the finding that small bodies, which were once thought have cooled rapidly and then remained static since the birth of the solar system, have turned out to come in a huge variety of shapes and compositions, and bear clear evidence of repeated remodeling. These small bodies have provided information about different areas of the solar system, and preserved chemicals that were present at its origin.

The other is the realization that the solar system isn’t a static, immutable collection of spheres. Instead, the solar system is chaotic: an early Earth collided with a Mars-sized object, destruction in the form of impacts by comets and asteroids still buffet all the planets, and the axes of rotation of the planets feel the pull of their peers, driving changes in planetary climates.

Planetary science may now be a mature field, but Burns suggests that its perspectives have continued to expand in recent years. The discovery that there may be liquid water on a number of solar system bodies has combined with the finding of organisms that thrive in extreme conditions on Earth to completely revise our understanding of the prospects for extraterrestrial life. The rapidly expanding catalog of extrasolar planets is finally enabling planetary scientists to leave the confines of our own solar system behind, and to consider all the probabilities and possibilities for planets throughout our galaxy.

Not bad for a field that NASA had to foster in order to meet its political imperatives.

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/07/how-computers-electronics-revolutionized-the-oldest-science.ars

Facebook data harvester speaks out

Facebook torrent The torrent is attracting hundreds of downloads

The man who harvested and published the personal details of 100m Facebook users has spoken out about his motives.

Ron Bowes, a security consultant, used a piece of code to scan Facebook profiles, collecting data not hidden by the user’s privacy settings.

The list, which contains the URL of every searchable Facebook user’s profile, name and unique ID, has been shared as a downloadable file.

Mr Bowes told BBC News that he did it as part of his work on a security tool.

“I’m a developer for the Nmap Security Scanner and one of our recent tools is called Ncrack,” he said.

“It is designed to test password policies of organisations by using brute force attacks; in other words, guessing every username and password combination.”

By downloading the data from Facebook, and compiling a user’s first initial and surname, he was able to make a list of the most common probable usernames to use in the tool.

The three most common names, he found, were jsmith, ssmith and skhan.

In theory, researchers could then combine this list with a catalogue of the most commonly used passwords to test the security of sites. Similar techniques could be used by criminals for more nefarious means.

Mr Bowes said his original plan was to “collect a good list of human names that could be used for these tests”.

“Once I had the data, though, I realised that it could be of interest to the community if I released it, so I did,” he added.

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

I am of the belief that, if I can do something then there are about 1,000 bad guys that can do it too”

End Quote Ron Bowes Security consultant

Mr Bowes confirmed that all the data he harvested was already publicly available but acknowledged that if anyone now changed their privacy settings, their information would still be accessible.

“If 100,000 Facebook users decide that they no longer want to be in Facebook’s directory, I would still have their name and URL but it would no longer, technically, be public,” he said.

Mr Bowes said that collecting the data was in no way irresponsible and likened it to a telephone directory.

“All I’ve done is compile public information into a nice format for statistical analysis,” he said

Simon Davies from the watchdog Privacy International told BBC News it was an “ethical attack” and that more personal information had not been included in the trawl.

“This is a reputational and business issue for Facebook, for now,” he said

“They can continue to ride the risk and hope nothing cataclysmic occurs, but I would argue that Facebook has a special responsibility to go beyond doing the bare minimum,” he added.

Snowball effect

Mr Bowes file has spread rapidly across the net.

On the Pirate Bay, the world’s biggest file-sharing website, the list was being distributed and downloaded by thousands of users.

Facebook Facebook hit its 500m user in mid June 2010

One user said that the list showed “why people need to read the privacy agreements and everything they click through”.

In a statement to BBC News, Facebook confirmed that the information in the list was already freely available online.

“No private data is available or has been compromised,” the statement added.

That view is shared by Mr Bowes, who added that harvesting this data highlighted the possible risks users put themselves in.

“I am of the belief that, if I can do something then there are about 1,000 bad guys that can do it too.

“For that reason, I believe in open disclosure of issues like this, especially when there’s minimal potential for anybody to get hurt.

“Since this is already public information, I see very little harm in disclosing it.”

Digital trends

However, he said, it also highlighted a new trend that was emerging in the digital age.

“With traditional paper media, it wasn’t possible to compile 170 million records in a searchable format and distribute it, but now we can,” he said.

“Having the name of one person means nothing, and having the name of a hundred people means nothing; it isn’t statistically significant.

“But when you start scaling to 170 million, statistical data emerges that we have never seen in the past.”

A spokesperson for Facebook said the list was “similar to the white pages of the phone book.

“This is the information available to enable people to find each other, which is the reason people join Facebook.”

“If someone does not want to be found, we also offer a number of controls to enable people not to appear in search on Facebook, in search engines, or share any information with applications.”

Earlier this year there was a storm of protest from users of the site over the complexity of Facebook’s privacy settings. As a result, the site rolled out simplified privacy controls.

Facebook has a default setting for privacy that makes some user information publicly available. People have to make a conscious choice to opt-out of the defaults.

More on This Story

Related stories

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10802730

'Google Me' site may be in the works

According to an online report, Google has invested more than $100  million in socal-game company Zynga.

According to an online report, Google has invested more than $100 million in socal-game company Zynga.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Reports: Google invested in “FarmVille” maker Zynga as it plans social-networking move
  • Online tech pundits say Google Me will aim to take on Facebook
  • Former Facebook technical officer says Google plans are “not a rumor”
//

RELATED TOPICS

(CNN) — If online reports are to be believed, Google could be cooking up a rival for Facebook — and bringing the maker of popular social games like “FarmVille” with them.

Google Games, built around some sort of partnership with casual-gaming company Zynga, is in the works and would be part of a larger social network called Google Me, according to technology blog Tech Crunch.

Statements from notable internet players, including Digg founder Kevin Rose and a former Facebook chief technical officer, have suggested in recent weeks that the search-engine giant is working on a social network geared toward rivaling Facebook.

TechCrunch this weekend reported that unnamed sources said Google has invested between $100 and $200 million in Zynga, the maker of successful online social games like “FarmVille” and “Mafia Wars.”

The investment part of the deal was confirmed last month and a “larger strategic project” is still in the works, according to that report.

A Zynga spokeswoman said Monday that the company has no comment on the reports. A Google spokesman referred questions to the company’s media-relations e-mail account, which did not respond to inquiries.

The popularity of Zynga’s games — more than 50 million people play them on any given day, according to developerAnalytics — could bring considerable heft to any online networking or gaming project Google launched.

The obvious question then would become whether the “Farmville” maker would pull its games from Facebook. That would be a tall order considering the success those games have seen.

The TechCrunch report also added a new wrinkle to the Google Me speculation — saying the Zynga deal would be part of a project called Google Games, according to sources.

On the question-and-answer site Quora, former Facebook technical officer Adam D’Angelo said the Google Me rumors are real. The project would build on Google Buzz, a social networking effort rolled out by Google in February, he said. Google Buzz has been widely criticized by tech pundits.

Reports have not offered details on how a Google site would look, whether it would link to Gmail and other Google pages like Buzz does, or how Google Games would integrate with it.

“This is not a rumor. This is a real project. There are a large number of people working on it. I am completely confident about this,”D’Angelo wrote.

“They realized that Buzz wasn’t enough and that they need to build out a full, first-class social network. They are modeling it off of Facebook.”

9 Beloved Characters Made Horrifying by Japan



Japan can take apart other people’s inventions, like radios or TV sets, and put them back together better, cheaper and likely in the shape of Hello Kitty. However, the Japanese skill for reverse engineering works less well when it comes to reconfiguring our beloved pop culture icons.

#9.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (TMNT: Legend of the Supermutants)

It seems almost impossible to out-”wha?” a show already titled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, but after muttering something about our lack of faith disappointing them, Japan outfitted the Turtles in flamboyant armor that looks like a LARP party on their way to a convention for Liberace Impersonators with an S & M fetish. Because giant, mutated turtles with mastery in martial arts don’t make sense without robo-armor and glittering codpieces.

Obviously Japan isn’t content until your head is spinning with questions. But if you think they’re gong to rest at mere costume-related questions like, “Why is Raphael wearing a bejeweled version of the murder dildo from Se7en?” or “Is Michelangelo about to be devoured by a giant metallic spider?” then you obviously don’t know what happens when the turtles get their hands on the magic stones. Yes, the magic stones.


Alpha, I need four mutated Dolph Lundgrens! Don’t worry about the body paint, he always brings his own.

Of course, once that’s done you simply must have them combine into a gigantic, winged robot…

…after Shredder turns into a city-destroying demon Godzilla because all other types of plot have been outlawed in Japan.

#8.
Star Wars (Star Wars Manga)

So you want to take Star Wars, and filter it through the magical lens of Japanese manga. Clearly the first step has to be to replace the original cast with 11-year-olds. Clearly.

Here’s Leia, looking young enough to make millions of gold bikini fantasies that much more unsettling…

… Luke looking a few years shy of a T-14 learner’s permit…

… and Han, looking too young to smuggle anything that’s not a dirty magazine.

And now the characters have the respect and dignity they deserve. Except Chewie, because you can’t have something that furry in a Japanese comic book and not turn it into a goofy gag-mascot. It’s in their constitution, apparently.

In the movies this guy could rip your arms off. In Japan he’s Marmaduke with a blaster rifle.

While giving the cast of Star Wars the Muppet Babies treatment might make us ask WHY? Japan has other questions on its mind. Specifically, if you shrink all the characters down to half their previous size, what happens to all that left over blood?


Answer: It sprays all over the goddamn place at the slightest provocation.

We also get some slight tweaks to the ending. For instance, Luke still honors his dying father’s request, and removes Vader’s helmet. He just doesn’t bother removing it from his head…

But hey, at least they didn’t replace the cast with big-titted anime girls!

#7.
Alice in Wonderland (Miyuki-chan in Wonderland)

Oh, Japan. We knew you’d come through.

Sometimes you don’t get the true meaning of a piece of art until you get an outsiders view of it. For instance, you probably thought Alice in Wonderland was a tale of childhood wonder as a young girl adventures in a mystical land where talking animals and magic abounds.

Of course you’re way off. Alice in Wonderland, as the Japanese show us, is really about a little girl lost in a world where she is hunted down viciously by whip-cracking dominatrixes and hordes of lesbian furries. Hey, the subtext is all there in Lewis Carroll’s original.

Let’s meet the cast! The White Rabbit:

Tweedledee and Tweedledum:

The Mad Hatter:

The Cheshire Cat:

And, best of all, the Queen of Hearts:

It’s probably worth mentioning that basically every one of those characters is out there to molest the titular Miyuki because that’s the entire plot of this cartoon. And because it’s girl-on-girl, that means these rape attempts are hilarious instead of deeply disturbing.

It would appear the Japanese have stripped away all the magic from Carroll’s tale. But to be fair, in Japan, Lesbians are magical creatures, like leprechauns.

#6.
Dracula (Hellsing)

By now the world has seen vampires that scare, amuse, arouse, teach math, peddle cereal and practice abstinence. So what new element could the anime series Hellsing possibly bring to the table? The answer: a pair of guns that you’d need Hammer pants to conceal.


There’s a place at the mall where you can get your gun engraved.

OK, so Alucard (not Dracula, mind you) now works for the Hellsing family after Van Hellsing defeated him one hundred years ago. And his guns have crucifixes on them. Sure, why not. By this point in the article no one should expect the Japanese give a damn about character integrity. Though they must be concerned about some kind of copyright infringement as they insist on adding an extra “L” to Helsing and only refer to Dracula by his lame backward name. Do the Japanese know what public domain means? Never mind, don’t tell them. It’s more fun this way.

Anyway, this here Dracu- sorry, Alucard, works for a supernatural evil fighting agency run by the Hellsing family. (Yeah, there’s a pretty big pinch of Hellboy in there.) Nevertheless, say what you will about this version of Dracula, but he is rocking that Zoot Suit.

And you’ve got to be a total pimp when you’re facing a giant dog made of eyes commanded by a pedophile with bitchin’ shoulder-pads.

Interestingly, Alucard’s enemies include vampire WWII Nazis and a KKK regiment.

#5.
Various World Leaders (Mudazumo Naki Kaikaku, The Legend of Koizumi)

Yep, that’s Kim Jong Il up there. The Legend of Koizumi is a satirical manga poking fun at the world’s politicians, featuring something like two million of them as characters (rough estimate).

The idea here is that these comic book politicians settle the Earth’s geopolitical differences by playing mahjong, with each round represented by a Dragonball Z-style attack with its own special name and over-the-top look.

Still, apart from the concept and the fact that Bush, Sr. is a nine-foot tall wrestler…


This guy only got one term?

…there’s really nothing that bizarre about the comic…

Ah, there we go. Why Hitler looks ready for the cover of Tiger Beat, we don’t know. Nor can we really explain this:

Bam! Super Aryan Hitler!

// <![CDATA[//

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.